Peec AI vs AEOTrack: Daily Tracking at $95 or Five Engines at $29
Peec AI and AEOTrack are answering the same question for different budgets. Both ask AI engines your buyers' questions and tell you whether you were named. Peec is the more polished tracker and runs daily; AEOTrack covers more engines at the base price and goes further into why you were not named. Here is the comparison as of September 2026, with the caveat that both products ship weekly.
Side by side
| Peec AI | AEOTrack | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $95/mo (Starter) | $29/mo (Starter) |
| Prompts at entry | 50 | 20 (50 on Pro, $79) |
| Engines at entry | 3 of ~8; extra models $30–140/mo each | 5 (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok); Google AI Mode being added |
| Cadence | Daily on every plan | Weekly scheduled + monthly re-check pool; daily on pinned questions from Pro |
| Seats | Unlimited | 3 on Starter, 5 on Pro, 10 on Business |
| Countries | 1 on Starter, 3 on Pro/Advanced | 1 |
| Citation tracking | Sources per answer | Sources per answer, per prompt, plus which cited pages name you and which do not |
| Confidence ranges | No | Yes, on every score |
| Branded vs non-branded split | Prompt tagging | Automatic, including near-brand detection |
| Fixes | Reporting only | FAQ and schema generator, content optimizer, Git pull requests, crawler-log analysis |
| Agency features | Agency plans from $245, pitch projects, Looker Studio | Multi-website plans; no white-label yet |
| Free trial | Yes | 14 days, no card |
Where Peec AI is the better choice
You are running experiments and need to see the effect tomorrow. Daily tracking on every prompt is Peec's core offer, and if you are shipping content changes weekly and want to watch the answers move day by day, weekly checks will feel slow.
You track several countries. Peec's multi-country tracking is real and AEOTrack does not have it. A brand selling into Germany and the US gets different answers and needs both.
You are an agency with many clients and a reporting deliverable. Unlimited seats, pitch projects and the Looker Studio integration are built for that workflow.
Where AEOTrack is the better choice
Your buyers use more than three engines. Claude and Grok are in AEOTrack's base plan. On Peec, the fourth and fifth models cost more than the plan itself.
You want to know whether a change was real. AI answers vary run to run. AEOTrack reports every score with a confidence range and only raises an alert when the ranges no longer overlap; a tool without ranges will show movement that is not there.
You want to act on the result inside the tool. The zero-score view shows which brands the engines named instead and which sources they read; the improvement plan is derived from the answers, not from a page audit; the FAQ generator and Git integration ship the on-site part. Peec tells you the score and leaves the rest to you.
Budget. At $29 against $95, and $79 against $245 at the next tier, AEOTrack is the cheaper way to buy the same information for a single brand.
What they have in common
Both use live engine calls rather than model memory, both separate mentions from citations, both show share of voice against named competitors, and both are honest about the fact that answers vary. If you are choosing between them, you have already ruled out the tools that fake the measurement.
Prices and features were checked on 5 September 2026 against each product's own pages and may have changed since. AEOTrack's column describes the product as shipped that day.
See what the engines say about you.
Presence, position, citations and sentiment — across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Grok. Free for 14 days, no credit card.
Start Your Free Trial →Score what actually matters.
Presence, position, citations and sentiment — across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Grok. Free for 14 days, no credit card.
Start Your Free Trial →